Market Update
Government Debt and Treasury Yields: Why Ben Carlson Isn't Worried
The short answer
The 10-year Treasury yield pushed toward 5% in early September 2026, a level Steve Ankerstar considers the threshold for economy-wide impact. Ben Carlson argues government debt is not a crisis, citing the reserve currency and roughly 180 trillion dollars in household net worth. Steve agrees default risk is low, but worries more about interest expense crowding out future investment.
Full video transcript
The 10-Year Treasury Yield Pushes Toward 5%
The 10-year Treasury yield hit a fresh high, pushing toward the 5% level that Steve identifies as the threshold where bond yields begin to register economy-wide. Below 5%, the impact on broader economic activity remains limited. The yield rose amid Fed Governor Barr's comment that he would support a rate hike if inflation does not ease, adding to the tension between raising rates to control inflation and increasing the government's interest expense on existing debt. Steve covers the bond market at (2:00).
Market Volatility in Context
Tech stocks pulled back about 1% and the S&P 500 declined roughly 0.67%, but both remain near all-time highs. Steve reframes what constitutes meaningful volatility: he does not consider the market "away from all-time highs" until drawdowns reach approximately 8%. For investors who are 100% in equities, particularly in a retirement planning context, he suggests thinking of the top 10% of account value as belonging to the market, since that portion can disappear quickly in a correction. Chasing high-water marks can drive investors to poor decisions. Steve discusses volatility context at (2:45).
Ben Carlson's Case: Why Government Debt Isn't a Crisis
Ben Carlson, author of A Wealth of Common Sense, argues that US government debt is not as alarming as many suggest. His case rests on five pillars: the United States has the world's largest and most dynamic economy, the biggest and most innovative companies, the most liquid financial markets, the global reserve currency, and the wealthiest population. Together, these factors mean there is no substitute for US Treasury bonds, which keeps demand for government debt intact regardless of the total amount outstanding. Steve introduces Carlson's argument at (4:15).
Debt-to-GDP and Interest Expense in Historical Context
Debt-to-GDP is not at an all-time high; it was higher during World War II. Interest expense as a percentage of GDP was also higher in 1990. However, Steve notes the key difference: during WWII there was emergency spending, while current spending occurs without a recession or national emergency. The concern is less about the absolute debt level and more about the slippery slope where interest expense consumes a growing share of the budget, forcing difficult tradeoffs between paying for past obligations and investing in the future. Steve covers the historical context at (6:00).
How fiscal policy evolves from here, including whether future tax rates move to help close funding gaps, is a variable worth building into a long-term tax planning strategy rather than reacting to after the fact.
Household Balance Sheets Are Healthy
A point often missing from debt alarm discussions is that US household balance sheets are in strong shape. Over half of homes have no mortgage. Household debt service is near multi-decade lows, well below the roughly 16% level seen during the Great Financial Crisis. US households hold approximately $205 trillion in assets against $22 trillion in liabilities, yielding roughly $180 trillion in net worth. When combining government and household debt as a percentage of GDP, the total has been flat for 20 years. The government has effectively sacrificed its own balance sheet to strengthen household balance sheets. Steve covers household finances at (8:00).
Where Steve Agrees and Disagrees with Carlson
Steve agrees with Carlson that the US government faces no realistic risk of insolvency, given the strength of the economy, the reserve currency, and the massive household tax base. However, he worries more than Carlson about the math problem between government revenue and expenses. When interest expense reaches a third of government revenue, it means paying for past promises at the expense of future investment. The current level is uncomfortable but not unforgivable. Steve also notes that government attempts to suppress yields or manipulate currencies can backfire by drawing attention to problems that markets had not been focused on. Steve gives his verdict at (12:40).
This article is general information, not personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Your situation is specific to you — talk to a qualified professional before acting on anything here.
Frequently asked questions
Is the US government at risk of defaulting on its debt?
No, according to both Ben Carlson and Steve Ankerstar. The US has the world's largest economy, the global reserve currency, the most liquid financial markets, and a household net worth of approximately $180 trillion. There is no substitute for US Treasury bonds, which keeps demand for government debt intact.
What is the concern with government debt if default risk is low?
The primary concern is that interest expense could consume a growing share of government revenue, reaching a third or more. At that level, the government is paying for past obligations rather than investing in the future. This creates a slippery slope where difficult budget tradeoffs become necessary, potentially impacting programs like Social Security.
How high is the 10-year Treasury yield?
As of early September 2026, the 10-year Treasury yield pushed toward 5%, hitting a fresh high. Steve identifies 5% as the threshold where bond yields begin to have economy-wide impact. Below that level, the effect on broader economic activity remains limited. The 30-year yield pushing toward 5.3% is also notable but remains below long-term historical averages.
Are US household balance sheets healthy despite government debt?
Yes. US households hold approximately $205 trillion in assets against $22 trillion in liabilities, yielding roughly $180 trillion in net worth. Over half of homes have no mortgage, and household debt service is near multi-decade lows. Government and household debt combined as a percentage of GDP has been flat for 20 years.
Should investors change their strategy based on government debt levels?
The current debt level is uncomfortable but not at a crisis point. Steve suggests that if market volatility persists and creates a larger dip, it could present an opportunity to add high-quality assets. Investors should consider their individual circumstances and consult a financial advisor before making changes. This is a financial education presentation, not investment advice. You must do your own due diligence before acting on anything you hear or read here.



