Skip to main content

Market Update

Government Debt and Treasury Yields: Why Ben Carlson Isn't Worried

By Steve Ankerstar

The short answer

The 10-year Treasury yield pushed toward 5% in early September 2026, a level Steve Ankerstar considers the threshold for economy-wide impact. Ben Carlson argues government debt is not a crisis, citing the reserve currency and roughly 180 trillion dollars in household net worth. Steve agrees default risk is low, but worries more about interest expense crowding out future investment.

Full video transcript
The chatter about debt and interest rates is really heating up in markets today. And actually, I'm going to highlight a prominent financial media like a financial voice who thinks that the government debt is just not that big a deal. Now, when you have a problem brewing, it's and of course, no one would say it's not a problem at all, but when you have a problem brewing out there, you're going to have some people say something like things are not as bad as they seem. They are worse. Or but I've got a voice today saying things are never as bad as they seem. Now, I will say in my life, um I've typically found that things are not usually as bad as they seem. Maybe I'll be a victim of a moment sometimes where something will seem like a big deal in the moment, but you look 3 months out, 6 months out, and you kind of glance back at it and you say, "Ah, okay, it wasn't so bad, you know, it could have been could have been much worse." Um so, I'm going to highlight this voice today, Ben Carlson, saying that things are not as bad as they seem. We'll do a market update as well. Before I begin, I must remind you this is financial education presentation. You must do your own due diligence before acting on anything you hear in this presentation. More disclaimer information can be found at ankerstarwealth.com. The opinions expressed are mine alone. Look, we've got the chatter heating up around this. And of course, what's this quote they put on the website, right? Is that uh Fed Governor Barr says he'll support a rate hike if inflation doesn't ease. Honestly, on a surface edit at face value, that's a very reasonable quote. That's what rate hikes are for is for helping with inflation. We are kind of in an interesting spot where there is so much debt and a lot has been issued on the front end of the curve that raising interest rates kind of increases your, you know, interest expense for the government, but it also does tamper growth, so the overall offset should be a kind of something that should cool inflation even with increasing the dollars out in circulation because of an increased interest expense on the debt. But, if we go look at these bonds here, let's look at the 10-year. They you know, this is what people are going to be talking about. Uh fresh new high here, pushing up toward 5%. Look, I mean, the We've said the whole time you don't really have anything hitting anything registering economy-wide until you get to like above 5% on the 10-year. So, let's remember that. But, if we do pop over, we do have markets throwing a little bit of a fit today. You know, your tech stocks down a percent, your S&P 500 down 2/3 of a percent. Don't forget, we're still right here. People get very um uh people will make pretty extreme comments at times. Like, all volatility, volatility. Uh we're we're still in market terms hanging out around all-time highs. I don't really consider us away from all-time highs until you're pushing maybe like an 8 or so percent drawdown. Uh and I would tell people like in a retirement scenario, you know, that top 10% if you're 100% equities, that last 10% of value in your account, that kind of belongs to the market. That's just that's just kind of how to think of it. Uh volatility can strike at any point, and that first 10% can go fast. You almost don't even want to think of it as yours. If you're a 100% equity investor, um it because it can go so fast. And if you start doing that high-water mark thing of I'm supposed to be here, here, but I'm 5% below that, you know, you could really drive yourself crazy. So, we do have market We'll see what happens. Uh we will see what happens. But, we're definitely a few percent away from all-time highs at this point. Now, here's what we're going to highlight, Ben Carlson. He is saying he has a contrarian opinion that the debt is not a big deal right now. He is not worried about US government debt. Now, some of the points he's mentioned in this article are points we've talked about on the show. So, he talks about how we have the world's largest, most dynamic economy. Okay, true. We have the biggest, most innovative companies. Super true. Like not even debatable. We have the most liquid financial markets. Super true. We have the global reserve currency. We absolutely do. And we have the most rich people. Definitely true. So, there is no substitute for US Treasury bonds at this time. This is his take. He's not as worried about the government debt crisis. If do I agree with all those things? I really do. I think the only time you'd come into a you'd start to worry about government debt is as it relates to the interest expense, right? Because the government does have revenue and expenses. And if the interest expense on the debt were to reach like a third of the government's revenue, then what does that do? You're paying you're only really allowed to pay for things that you did in the past. You're paying interest on investment you made in the past. You're and you're prevented from making investment in the future, right? Cuz you wouldn't be able to take on much more debt, you know, blah blah blah. So, that's kind of the math problem that I would be worried about. I actually don't worry about the 40 trillion. So, here as much as as others and Ben Carlson would agree with that. Now, the market we'll see what the market thinks. This is Ben Carlson's take is that things are not as bad as they seem. Here he goes GDP debt to GDP going way back. So, again, we aren't really at all-time highs. We were higher in World War II. Now, you could only get argument that things are we're not in a World War II type scenario right now. We don't have emergency spending. We don't even have a recession. We just are spending to spend. So that's not great. But it has been higher in the past. Okay, interest expense as a percent of GDP, it's also been higher in the past. In 1990, it was higher. You yeah. So it's it and it feels like it's a slippery slope, right? That's kind of the the thing that people worry about. This is a slippery slope. Interest expense as a percent of GDP not fun, not great. The worry is that our interest expense becomes such a large part of the budget that difficult choices have to be made. And then he's saying so he actually makes the point down here that the problem is a little bit less about the debt and it's more about the politics around it. So there are so many people worried about government debt, but no politicians willing to do anything about it that eventually it impacts Social Security or other important government spending programs. Um there might be a politician that uses government debt levels as a scare tactic to gain voters and attention. All right. So he makes that point that there is a political risk associated with this. Here he talks about Morgan Housel's chart showing both government and household debt as a percent of GDP. What doesn't get talked about is that going into the Great Financial Crisis, consumers were stretched like consumer balance sheets, govern citizen balance sheets were really messed up. And that is not the case today. People are extremely rich. I think we've talked about it on the show. I don't know what percentage of houses are have no mortgage. It's like over half, well over half, I believe. Um people don't have tons of debt. Savings rates are a little low right now. People are a little stretched based on inflation. But actual um household balance sheets are really healthy. The government has sort of sacrificed their own balance sheet as a way to enrich the the people of the country. And if you balance those things together, we haven't had any growth there over the past 20 years. So, uh government and household debt as a percent of GDP is flat going back to the great financial crisis. Who would have thought, right? You have all this alarmist um speech out there about debt, debt, debt, but they're not talking about how rich the families have gotten during this time. Here he talks about household uh debt service. Remember, we've even mentioned on the show households are spending less on debt uh now than almost ever before. Um going back to the great financial crisis, you were pushing close to 16%. Very stretched at that time. Here's the other thing. The one of the biggest assets of the United States government are the United States citizens. And United States citizens have assets of 205 trillion minus liabilities of 22 trillion. You know, so you've got net assets of about 180 trillion. Now, of course, we don't want government debt to be to match this. That would be kind of impossible uh mathematically. But, you know, with the the government, if push came to shove, could they do they have a tax base that could pay a little more into the system and you know, fix the right the wrong that that they've spent? Yeah. Yeah, they they could. Uh at any time and that's why the if you are an owner of the government debt, you shouldn't be too worried. Okay. Um so Colin Roche said that you know, he mentioned how many assets that the US government and this doesn't even mention like the gold that the government owns, the land, the the other I'm sure mineral rights and other things that the government owns. This is just household balance sheet. Last thing. Um you know, if you look at the the spread interest rate spread between different bond yields, you know, you're at an average range. You have long-term bond yields that really are below a long-term average. Again, some people would say it's not the rate, it's the trend. Oh, which is scary and and I do agree and kind of sympathize with that. But just at face value, 5% on the 30-year is not a big deal. It shouldn't even be viewed as that. It shouldn't even be if you're the government right now, you should be saying, "Hey, these these rates are like below long-term average. Hey, the 10-year? I mean, it's who's to worried about the 10-year? What? We haven't we've been, you know, at or below this range this entire century. Who's worried about that? You shouldn't be." So, you know, and then we get these things the government comes out and they're trying to suppress yields or manipulate currencies. That's almost like making it worse. Have you ever had that thing where somebody's like, "Oh, nothing to see here. Nothing to see here." And then you're like, "Well, wait, wait, wait. What do you mean? I wasn't looking. Now I'm looking." What do you mean there's nothing to see here? That's kind of how it It really is like there's nothing to see here on a long-term basis, but then the government comes out tries to do the currency stuff, the the bond market stuff, and you start saying, "Well, what what are you guys so worried about? What's the what's the deal? What are you hiding here?" So, um do I agree with Ben Carlson and just wanted to give a shout-out amazing article here or blog post uh a Wealthy Common Sense Ben Carlson. Thank you for your work and uh we really appreciate that. Um do I agree or disagree? Look, I think I worry more about the the math problem between government revenue and expenses and where the interest expense relates in that because the interest expense ultimately is you paying for past promises, whereas, you know, it's preventing you from investing in the future. Um so, I do worry about that. Um are we at a level now that's like unforgivable? No, not really, but it's it's uncomfortable a little bit. Uh but do I believe that the government is like going to have risk of insolvency? Absolutely not. I don't I don't think about that at all uh because of all the points that Ben Carlson points mentions here. So, that's my take. That's Ben Carlson's take. We will see what happens. What do you think about this volatility in the market today? Uh I'm very interested to see if it holds and if it does and it persists a bit and we get a little bit bigger dip, then that's an opportunity to uh add high-quality assets um you know, in the coming weeks and months. So, I'll be looking forward to that if it comes or also looking forward to new highs if that comes. Thank you so much for joining us. Of course, look forward to talking to you soon.

The 10-Year Treasury Yield Pushes Toward 5%

The 10-year Treasury yield hit a fresh high, pushing toward the 5% level that Steve identifies as the threshold where bond yields begin to register economy-wide. Below 5%, the impact on broader economic activity remains limited. The yield rose amid Fed Governor Barr's comment that he would support a rate hike if inflation does not ease, adding to the tension between raising rates to control inflation and increasing the government's interest expense on existing debt. Steve covers the bond market at (2:00).

Market Volatility in Context

Tech stocks pulled back about 1% and the S&P 500 declined roughly 0.67%, but both remain near all-time highs. Steve reframes what constitutes meaningful volatility: he does not consider the market "away from all-time highs" until drawdowns reach approximately 8%. For investors who are 100% in equities, particularly in a retirement planning context, he suggests thinking of the top 10% of account value as belonging to the market, since that portion can disappear quickly in a correction. Chasing high-water marks can drive investors to poor decisions. Steve discusses volatility context at (2:45).

Ben Carlson's Case: Why Government Debt Isn't a Crisis

Ben Carlson, author of A Wealth of Common Sense, argues that US government debt is not as alarming as many suggest. His case rests on five pillars: the United States has the world's largest and most dynamic economy, the biggest and most innovative companies, the most liquid financial markets, the global reserve currency, and the wealthiest population. Together, these factors mean there is no substitute for US Treasury bonds, which keeps demand for government debt intact regardless of the total amount outstanding. Steve introduces Carlson's argument at (4:15).

Debt-to-GDP and Interest Expense in Historical Context

Debt-to-GDP is not at an all-time high; it was higher during World War II. Interest expense as a percentage of GDP was also higher in 1990. However, Steve notes the key difference: during WWII there was emergency spending, while current spending occurs without a recession or national emergency. The concern is less about the absolute debt level and more about the slippery slope where interest expense consumes a growing share of the budget, forcing difficult tradeoffs between paying for past obligations and investing in the future. Steve covers the historical context at (6:00).

How fiscal policy evolves from here, including whether future tax rates move to help close funding gaps, is a variable worth building into a long-term tax planning strategy rather than reacting to after the fact.

Household Balance Sheets Are Healthy

A point often missing from debt alarm discussions is that US household balance sheets are in strong shape. Over half of homes have no mortgage. Household debt service is near multi-decade lows, well below the roughly 16% level seen during the Great Financial Crisis. US households hold approximately $205 trillion in assets against $22 trillion in liabilities, yielding roughly $180 trillion in net worth. When combining government and household debt as a percentage of GDP, the total has been flat for 20 years. The government has effectively sacrificed its own balance sheet to strengthen household balance sheets. Steve covers household finances at (8:00).

Where Steve Agrees and Disagrees with Carlson

Steve agrees with Carlson that the US government faces no realistic risk of insolvency, given the strength of the economy, the reserve currency, and the massive household tax base. However, he worries more than Carlson about the math problem between government revenue and expenses. When interest expense reaches a third of government revenue, it means paying for past promises at the expense of future investment. The current level is uncomfortable but not unforgivable. Steve also notes that government attempts to suppress yields or manipulate currencies can backfire by drawing attention to problems that markets had not been focused on. Steve gives his verdict at (12:40).

This article is general information, not personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Your situation is specific to you — talk to a qualified professional before acting on anything here.

Frequently asked questions

Is the US government at risk of defaulting on its debt?

No, according to both Ben Carlson and Steve Ankerstar. The US has the world's largest economy, the global reserve currency, the most liquid financial markets, and a household net worth of approximately $180 trillion. There is no substitute for US Treasury bonds, which keeps demand for government debt intact.

What is the concern with government debt if default risk is low?

The primary concern is that interest expense could consume a growing share of government revenue, reaching a third or more. At that level, the government is paying for past obligations rather than investing in the future. This creates a slippery slope where difficult budget tradeoffs become necessary, potentially impacting programs like Social Security.

How high is the 10-year Treasury yield?

As of early September 2026, the 10-year Treasury yield pushed toward 5%, hitting a fresh high. Steve identifies 5% as the threshold where bond yields begin to have economy-wide impact. Below that level, the effect on broader economic activity remains limited. The 30-year yield pushing toward 5.3% is also notable but remains below long-term historical averages.

Are US household balance sheets healthy despite government debt?

Yes. US households hold approximately $205 trillion in assets against $22 trillion in liabilities, yielding roughly $180 trillion in net worth. Over half of homes have no mortgage, and household debt service is near multi-decade lows. Government and household debt combined as a percentage of GDP has been flat for 20 years.

Should investors change their strategy based on government debt levels?

The current debt level is uncomfortable but not at a crisis point. Steve suggests that if market volatility persists and creates a larger dip, it could present an opportunity to add high-quality assets. Investors should consider their individual circumstances and consult a financial advisor before making changes. This is a financial education presentation, not investment advice. You must do your own due diligence before acting on anything you hear or read here.

Keep reading

Get started

Thirty minutes, no cost, no pitch.

Bring documents or bring nothing. We'll tell you what we'd look at first — and whether we're the right fit.

Start the conversation

Ankerstar Wealth

Upcoming Events

We host most Thursdays at the Endgame Lounge in Leander — no presentation, no pitch, just a reason to be in the same room.

See what’s on